Toggle navigation
Log-in
myITGuide
Page Index
User Index
Application Index
Global
Wiki Index
Home
Blog
Links
Database
SQL Server
Cassandra
BigData
PostgreSQL
Redis
MariaDB
MongoDB
Tools
T-SQL
Powershell
Python
Scala
R
Jupyter
Java
Solution
Streaming
Spark
Storm
Search
Solr
ElasticSearch
Kafka
Puppet
Kibana
Docker
Kubernetes
OS
Windows
Linux
About
About Us
Email Us
SQL Server
SQL Server Architecture
Wiki source code of
SQL Server Architecture
Last modified by
Billie D
on 2021/02/12 14:22
Copy
Export
Print preview
View Source
Siblings
Content
Comments
Information
×
Export
Office Formats
Export as PDF
Other Formats
Export as HTML
Show line numbers
{{box cssClass="floatinginfobox" title="**Contents**"}} {{toc /}} {{/box}} [[image:About Us.WebHome@myitguide_small_01.jpg]] = DATABASE TRANSACTIONS = A **transaction** is a unit of work in a database, that it must complete all the commands in their entirety or none of them (atomocity) == ACID Properties == * **Atomicity** ** Atomicity means that all the effects of the transaction must **complete** successfully or the changes are rolled back. * **Consistency** ** The consistency requirement ensures that the transaction cannot break the **integrity rules** of the database; it must leave the database in a consistent state. * **Isolation** ** Each transaction must be entirely **self-contained**, and changes it makes must not be readable by any other transaction, control the degree of isolation in order to find a balance between business and performance requirements. * **Durability** ** Once a transaction is committed, it must **persist** even if there is a system failure — that is, it must be durable. == SQL Server Transactions == * **//Implicit//** transactions are used automatically by SQL Server to guarantee the ACID properties of single commands. * **//Explicit//** transactions are started by using the //BEGIN TRANSACTION// T-SQL command and are stopped by using the //COMMIT TRANSACTION //or //ROLLBACK TRANSACTION //commands. ** Explicit transactions are used to group together changes to which you want to apply the ACID properties as a whole, which also enables you to roll back the changes at any point if your business logic determines that you should cancel the change. == The Life Cycle of a Query == [[image:LifecycleofQuery.jpg||height="550" width="794"]] SQL Server is divided into __**two** main **engines**__: the __**Relational** Engine__ and the __**Storage** Engine__. * //The **Relational Engine**// is also sometimes called the query processor because its __primary function is query optimization and execution__. It contains a **Command Parser** to check query **syntax** and prepare query trees; a **Query Optimizer** that is arguably the **crown jewel** of any database system; and a **Query Executor** responsible for execution. * //The **Storage Engine**// is responsible for __managing all I/O to the data__, and it contains the **Access Methods** code, which handles I/O requests for rows, indexes, pages, allocations and row versions; and a **Buffer Manager**, which __deals with SQL Server’s main memory__ consumer, the **buffer pool**. It also contains a **Transaction Manager**, which __handles the locking__ of data to maintain isolation (ACID properties) and manages the transaction log. === The Buffer Pool === **Buffer pool**, which is the **largest consumer of memory** in SQL Server. The buffer pool contains all the different caches in SQL Server, including the plan cache and the data cache. === SQL Server Network Interface (SNI) === * **protocol layer** that __establishes the network connection__ between the client and the server. * It consists of a set of APIs that are used by both the database engine and the **SQL Server Native Client** (SNAC). * once the connection is established, SNI creates a **secure connection** to a **TDS endpoint** (described next) on the server, which is then used to send requests and receive data. ** __SNI replaces the net-libraries found in SQL Server 2000__ and the Microsoft Data Access Components __(MDAC), which are included with Windows.__ ** SNI **isn’t configurable directly**; you just need to configure a network protocol on the client and the server. ** Protocol SQL Server supports *** Shared Memory **** __Simple and fast__, shared memory is the __default protocol__ used to connect from a client running on the same computer as SQL Server. It can only be used locally, has no configurable properties, and is always tried first when connecting from the local machine. *** **TCP/IP** **** This is the __most commonly__ used access protocol for SQL Server. It enables you to connect to SQL Server by specifying an IP address and a port number. (**1433** tcp, **1434** udp). **** Your internal name resolution system resolves the hostname part of the instance name to an IP address **** you connect to the default TCP port number **1433** for **default instances** //__or __//the **SQL Browser** service will **find the right port** for a named instance using UDP port 1434. *** Name Pipes **** Named Pipes was developed for **local area networks** __(LANs)__ but it can be inefficient across slower networks such as wide area networks (WANs). (TCP 445) **** You create SQL Server alias, which connects to the server using Named Pipes. *** VIA **** Virtual Interface Adapter is a protocol that enables __high-performance__ communications between two systems. It requires __specialized hardware__ at both ends and a dedicated connection. **** You create SQL Server alias, which connects to the server using VIA. **** While __SQL Server 2012 still supports the VIA protocol, it **will be removed **from a future version__ so new installations using this protocol should be avoided. === Tabular Data Stream (TDS) Endpoints === * TDS is a **Microsoft-proprietary** protocol originally designed by **Sybase** that is used to interact with a database server. * Once a connection has been made using a **network protocol** such as **TCP/IP**, __a link is established to the relevant **TDS endpoint** __that then **acts as the communication point** between the client and the server. * There is __**one TDS endpoint** for **each network protocol**__ and an **additional one reserved** for use by the dedicated administrator connection (**DAC**). * Once connectivity is established, __TDS messages are used to communicate between the client and the server__ * The SELECT statement is sent to the SQL Server as a **TDS message** __across a TCP/IP connection__ TCP/IP is the default protocol). === Protocol Layer === * When the protocol layer in SQL Server receives your TDS packet, it has **to reverse the work of the SNI** at the client and **unwrap the packet** to find out what request it contains. * The protocol layer is also responsible for **packaging results** and **status messages** to **send back** to the client as TDS messages. === Command Parser === * The Command Parser’s role is to handle **T-SQL** language events. ** It first **__checks the syntax__** and returns any errors back to the protocol layer to send to the client. ** If the syntax is valid, then the next step is to **__generate a query plan__** or find an existing plan. ** A query plan contains the details about how SQL Server is going to execute a piece of code. It is commonly referred to as an **//execution plan//**. ** To check for a query plan, the Command Parser generates a **hash of the T-SQL** and __checks it against__ the **plan cache** to determine whether a suitable plan already exists. ** The **plan cache** is an area in the buffer pool used to **cache query plans**. === Plan Cache === * The plan cache, __part of SQL Server’s buffer pool__, is used to **__store execution plans__** in case they are needed later. * If no cached plan is found, then the Command Parser generates a query tree based on the T-SQL. A **query tree** is an __internal structure__ whereby __each node in the tree represents an operation__ in the query that needs to be performed. [[image:LifecycleofQuery_02.jpg||height="580" width="658"]] === Query Optimizer === * The Query Optimizer is the **__most prized possession__** of the SQL Server team and one of the most complex and secretive parts of the product. * “**cost-based**” optimizer * __find **a good plan** in a reasonable amount of time__, rather than the best plan, finding the most efficient plan * __performs multi-stage optimization__, increasing the number of decisions available to find a good plan at each stage ** pre-optimization, simple query or trivial plans, removing the need for additional costs ** phase 0 - looks at nested loop joins and won’t consider parallel operators, transaction processing, or TP, plan. < 0.2 ** phase 1 - looks for common patterns. quick plans, < 1.0 ** phase 2 - final phase is where the optimizer pulls out all the stops and is able to use all of its **optimization rules**. looks at **parallelism** and **indexed views**, is a balance between the cost of the plan found versus the time spent optimizing. full plan [[image:LifecycleofQuery_03.jpg||height="408" width="718"]] === Query Executor === * __it **executes** the query plan__ by working through each step it contains and interacting with the **Storage Engine** to retrieve or modify data * The SELECT query needs to retrieve data, so the request is passed to the Storage Engine through an **OLE DB interface** to the Access Methods. [[image:LifecycleofQuery_05.jpg||height="246" width="755"]] === Access Methods === * provides the __storage structures for your data and indexes__, as well as the **interface through which data is retrieved** and **modified**. * but it __doesn’t actually perform the operation itself__; it passes the request to the **Buffer Manager**. * at are all on a single page. The Access Methods code will ask the Buffer Manager to retrieve the page so that it can prepare an __OLE DB rowset to pass back to the Relational Engine__. === Buffer Manager === * **manages** the **buffer pool**, which represents the majority of SQL Server’s memory usage. * If the page __isn’t already in cache__, then the Buffer Manager __gets the page from the database on disk__, puts it in the data cache, and passes the results to the Access Methods. * The key point to take away from this is that __**you only ever work **with **data in memory**__. * Every new data read that you request is first read from disk and then written to memory (the data cache) before being returned as a result set. * This is why SQL Server needs to __maintain a minimum level of free pages in memory__; you wouldn’t be able to read any new data if there were no space in cache to put it first. * The Buffer Manager checked whether it already had it in the data cache, and then loaded it from disk into the cache when it couldn’t find it. === Data Cache === * The data cache is usually the **largest part** of the **buffer pool**; therefore, it’s the __largest memory consumer within SQL Server__. * It is here that every **data page** that is **read from disk** is written to before being used. * The __//sys.dm_os_buffer_descriptors//__ DMV contains one **row for every data page currently held in cache**. You can use this script to see **how much space each database** is using in the **data cache**: | {{code language="SQL"}}SELECT count (*) * 8/1024 AS 'Cached Size (MB)' , CASE database_id WHEN 32767 THEN 'ResourceDb' ELSE db_name(database_id) END AS 'Database' FROM //sys.dm_os_buffer_descriptors // GROUP BY db_name(database_id),database_id ORDER BY 'Cached Size (MB)' DESC{{/code}} * The** amount of time that pages stay in cache** is determined by a __least recently used__ (**LRU**) policy. ** The header of each page in cache stores details about the last two times it was accessed, and a periodic scan through the cache examines these values. A counter is maintained that is decremented if the page hasn’t been accessed for a while; and when SQL Server needs to free up some cache, the pages with the lowest counter are flushed first. (**lazy writer** process) ** You can view how long SQL Server expects to be able to keep a page in cache by looking at the **MSSQL$<instance>:Buffer Manager\Page Life Expectancy** counter in Performance Monitor. **Page life expectancy (PLE)** is the amount of time, **in seconds**, that SQL Server expects to be able to keep a page in cache. *** Under **memory pressure**, **data pages** are **flushed** from cache far more frequently. Microsoft has a long standing recommendation for a //minimum of **300 seconds**// for **PLE** but a good value is generally considered to be **1000s of seconds these days**. ** query is now in the data cache in the buffer pool and will have an entry in the //sys.dm_os_buffer_descriptors// DMV. Now that the Buffer Manager has the result set, it’s passed back to the **Access Methods** to make its way to the client. == Basic SELECT query == |((( **1.** The SQL Server Network Interface (**SNI**) on the client established a connection to the SNI on the SQL Server using a network protocol such as TCP/IP. It then** created a connection **to a **TDS endpoint** over the TCP/IP connection and sent the SELECT statement to SQL Server as a **TDS message**. \\**2.** The SNI on the SQL Server unpacked the TDS message, read the SELECT statement, and passed a “SQL Command” to the **Command Parser**. \\**3.** The Command Parser checked the **plan cache** in the buffer pool for an existing, usable query plan that matched the statement received. When it didn’t find one, it created a query tree based on the SELECT statement and passed it to the **Optimizer** to generate a query plan. \\**4.** The Optimizer generated a “zero cost” or “trivial” plan in the pre-optimization phase because the statement was so simple. The __query plan__ created was then passed to the **Query Executor** for execution. \\**5.** At execution time, the Query Executor determined that data needed to be read to complete the query plan so it passed the request to the **Access Methods** in the **Storage Engine** via an **__OLE DB interface__**. \\**6.** The Access Methods needed to read a page from the database to complete the request from the Query Executor and asked the **Buffer Manager** to provision the data page. \\**7.** The Buffer Manager checked the data cache to see if it already had the page in cache. **It wasn’t in cache so it pulled the page from disk**, put it in cache, and passed it back to the Access Methods. \\**8.** Finally, the Access Methods passed the result set back to the **Relational Engine** to send to the **client**. [[image:LifecycleofQuery_06.jpg||height="631" width="838"]] ))) == A Simple Update Query == |((( The good news is that the process is **exactly the same** as the process for the **SELECT** statement you just looked at until you get to the Access Methods. The Access Methods need to make a data modification this time, so **before the I/O request is passed on**, the **details of the change** need to be **persisted to disk**. That is the job of the **Transaction Manager**. The actual data modification can only be performed when **confirmation** is received that the operation has been **physically written** to the **transaction log**. This is why **transaction log performance** is **so crucial**. ))) === Transaction Manager === * **Lock Manager** ** is responsible for __providing **concurrency** to the data__, and it delivers the configured level of isolation (as defi ned in the ACID properties) * **Log Manager** ** The Access Methods code requests that the changes it wants to make are logged, and the Log Manager writes the changes to the transaction log. This is called **write-ahead logging (WAL)**. ** Writing to the transaction log is the only part of a data modification transaction that always needs a **physical write to disk** because SQL Server depends on being** able to reread** that change in the **event of system failure**. ** What’s actually stored in the **transaction log** isn’t a list of modification statements but __only details of the page changes that occurred as the result of a modification statement.__ ** The actual data modification can __only be performed when confirmation is received that the operation has been physically written to the transaction log.__ This is why **transaction log** **performance** is **so crucial**. ** Once confirmation is received by the **Access Methods**, it passes the modification request on to the **Buffer Manager** to complete. === Buffer Manager === * The page that needs to be modified is already in cache, so all the __Buffer Manager needs to do is modify the page required by the update as requested by the Access Methods.__ * The** __page__**__ is **modified** in the **cache**__, and confirmation is sent back to Access Methods and ultimately to the client. * the UPDATE statement has changed the data in the data cache, __**not in** the actual database file on** disk**__. ** This is done __for performance reasons__, and the page is now what’s called a **__dirty page__** because it’s different in memory from what’s on disk. * __the durability__ of the modification as defined in the ACID properties you can __re-create the change using the **transaction log**__ [[image:LifecycleofQuery_08.jpg||height="624" width="868"]] === Recovery === * Modifications are __written to the transaction log__ first and are then __action in memory only__. * This is done for **performance reasons** and enables you to recover the changes from the transaction log if necessary. === Dirty Pages === * When a page is read from disk into memory it is regarded as a clean page because it’s exactly the same as its counterpart on the disk. * However, once the __page has been modified in memory__ it is marked as a **dirty page**. * __Clean pages can be flushed from cache__ using// **__dbcc dropcleanbuffer__s**//, which can be handy when you’re __troubleshooting development__ and test environments because it forces subsequent reads to be fulfilled from disk, rather than cache, but doesn’t touch any dirty pages. * A dirty page is simply a page that has changed in memory since it was loaded from disk and is now different from the on-disk page. |{{code language="SQL"}}SELECT db_name(database_id) AS 'Database',count(page_id) AS 'Dirty Pages' FROM sys.dm_os_buffer_descriptors WHERE is_modified =1 GROUP BY db_name(database_id) ORDER BY count(page_id) DESC{{/code}} * These __dirty pages will be written back to the database file__ **periodically** __whenever the **free buffer list is low**__ or a __**checkpoint** occurs__. * SQL Server always tries to **maintain** a number of **free pages** in cache in order **to allocate pages quickly**, and these free pages are tracked in the **free buffer list.** * Whenever a __**worker thread**__ issues a read request, it gets a list of **64 pages** in cache and checks whether the free buffer list is below a certain threshold. If it is, it will__ try to age-out some pages in its list, which causes any dirty pages to be written to disk__. Another thread called the __**lazy writer**__ also works based on a low free buffer list. === Lazy Writer === * The lazy writer is a __**thread** that **periodically** checks the size of the **free buffer list**__. * When it’s low, it scans the whole data cache to age-out any pages that haven’t been used for a while. * If it finds any dirty pages that haven’t been used for a while, they are __flushed to disk before being marked as free in memory.__ * The lazy writer a__lso **monitors** the **free physical memory** on the server__ and will **__release memory__** from the free buffer list __back to Windows in very low memory conditions.__ * When SQL Server is busy, it will also grow the size of the free buffer list to meet demand (and therefore the buffer pool) when there is free physical memory and the configured** Max Server Memory** threshold hasn’t been reached === Checkpoint Process === * A **checkpoint** is a point in time created by the checkpoint process at which SQL Server can be sure that any **committed transactions** have had all their changes **written to disk**. * This checkpoint then becomes the __**marker** from which database **recovery can start**.__ * The checkpoint process ensures that any __dirty pages associated with a committed transaction will be flushed to disk__. * It can also flush uncommitted dirty pages to disk to make efficient use of writes * but **unlike the lazy writer**, a checkpoint __**does not** remove the page from cache__; it ensures the dirty page is written to disk and then __**marks the cached paged** as clean in the page header.__ * By default, on a busy server, SQL Server will issue a __**checkpoint** roughly **every minute**__, which is marked in the transaction log. [[image:LifecycleofQuery_09.jpg||height="247" width="743"]] * The **time between checkpoints**, therefore, represents the amount of work that needs to be done to **roll forward** any **committed transactions** that occurred **after the last checkpoint**, and to **roll back any transactions** that were **not committed**. * By checkpointing **every minute,** SQL Server is trying to **keep the recovery time** when starting a database **to less than one minute**, __but it won’t automatically checkpoint unless at least 10MB has been written to the log within the period__. * Checkpoints can also be **manually called** by using the **//CHECKPOINT//** T-SQL command, and can occur because of other events happening in SQL Server. * **Trace flag 3502** records in the error log when a checkpoint starts and stops. ==== Recovery Interval ==== * Recovery Interval is a **__server configuration option__** that can be used __to influence the **time between checkpoints**__ * __By default__, the recovery interval is set to __**0**__; ** this enables SQL Server to **choose an appropriate interval** ** which usually equates to roughly one minute between automatic checkpoints * Changing this **value **to greater than 0 represents the number of **minutes **you want to allow between checkpoints * Under most circumstances __you won’t need to change this value__ * SQL Server evens throttles checkpoint I/O to stop it from affecting the disk subsystem too much, so __it’s quite good at self-governing__. * SLEEP_BPOOL_FLUSH wait type on your server, that means checkpoint I/O was throttled to maintain overall system performance = Recovery Models = * SQL Server has three database recovery models: full, bulk-logged, and simple * **affects** the way the** transaction log** is used and how big it grows, your **backup strategy**, and your **restore options**. == Full Recovery Model == * all their operations **__fully logged__** in the transaction log and must have a backup strategy that includes __**full backups** and **transaction log** backups__ * **__Starting with SQL Server 2005, full backups don’t truncate the transaction log__** ** This is done so that the sequence of transaction log backups isn’t broken and __it gives you an extra recovery option if your full backup is damaged.__ * **highest level** of recoverability should use the full recovery * __point-in-time-recovery__ is possible, based on the **interval** of the **transaction log backup** == Bulk-logged == * special recovery model because it is intended to be __used **only temporarily** to **improve the performance** of certain **bulk operations**__ by __minimally logging them__ * __all other operations are fully logged__ just like the full recovery model. * __only the information required to roll back the transaction is logged__. __**Redo **information is **not logged**__, which means you also__ **lose point-in-time-recovery**.__ * These bulk operations include the following: ➤ BULK INSERT ➤ Using the bcp executable ➤ SELECT INTO ➤ CREATE INDEX ➤ ALTER INDEX REBUILD ➤ DROP INDEX BULK-LOGGED AND TRANSACTION LOG BACKUPS Using bulk-logged mode is intended to make your **bulk-logged operation** complete **faster.** It does not reduce the disk space requirement for your transaction log backups. == Simple == * __**all committed** transactions are **truncated**__ from the transaction log every time __a **checkpoint occurs**__. * ensures that the __**size** of the **log** is kept to a **minimum**__ and that **transaction log backups** are __**not**__ necessary (or even possible) * If the potential to lose all changes since the last full or __differential backup__ still meets your business requirements, then simple recovery might be the way to go. = EXECUTION MODEL AND THE SQLOS = * **SQLOS** is a **__thin user-mode __**layer that sits between SQL Server and Windows * for **low-level** operations such as ** scheduling, ** I/O completion, ** memory management, ** and resource management. == Execution Model == * When an application authenticates to SQL Server it establishes a connection in the context of a **//session//**, which is identified by a **//session_id//**, (in older versions of SQL Server this was called a **//SPID//**) * You can view a list of all authenticated sessions by querying the **//sys.dm_exec_sessions//** DMV * When an execution request is made within a session, SQL Server **divides the work** into one or more //**tasks**// and then associates a //**worker thread**// to each task for its duration. Each thread can be in one of three states (that you need to care about) |((( === Running === * A processor can only execute one thing at a time and the thread **currently executing on a processor** will have a state of running. === Suspended === * SQL Server has a **co-operative scheduler** so __running threads will **yield the processor**__ and become suspended while they wait for a resource. This is what we call a __**wait**__ in SQL Server. === Runnable === * When a thread has __finished waiting__, it becomes runnable which means that __it’s **ready to execute again**__. This is known as a **//__signal wait__//.** ))) * If no worker threads are available and **max worker threads** has not been reached, then SQL Server will allocate a new worker thread. __If the max worker threads count has been reached__, then the task will wait with a **wait type** of **__THREADPOOL__** until a thread becomes available. * The default **max workers** count is __based on the **CPU architecture** (64 or 32 bit) and the number of logical processors__. |INCREASING THE MAX WORKER THREADS SETTING \\Running out of worker threads (**THREADPOOL** wait type) is often __a symptom of **large numbers** of concurrent **parallel execution plans**__ (since **one thread** is used **per processor**), or it can even indicate that you’ve reached the performance capacity of the server and __//need to buy one with more processors//__. Either way, you’re usually better off trying to solve the underlying problem rather than overriding the default Max Worker Threads setting. * Each worker thread requires **2MB of RAM on a 64-bit** server and 0.5MB on a 32-bit server, so SQL Server creates threads only as it needs them, rather than all at once. * The **//sys.dm_os_workers//** DMV contains one row for every **worker thread**, so you can see how many threads SQL Server currently has == Schedulers == * **Each thread** has an associated **scheduler**, which has the function of __scheduling time for each of its threads on a processor__. * The number of schedulers available to SQL Server equals the **//number of logical processors//** that SQL Server can use **plus an extra one** for the dedicated administrator connection (**DAC**). //sys.dm_os_schedulers// DMV. * Windows is a general-purpose OS and is not optimized for server-based applications, SQL Server in particular ** the goal of the Windows development team is to ensure that all applications, written by a wide variety of developers inside and outside Microsoft, will work correctly and have good performance ** the scheduling in Windows is very basic to ensure that it’s suitable for a common cause ** but if an application does its own scheduling then there is more intelligence about what to choose next, such as assigning some threads a higher priority or deciding that choosing one thread for execution will avoid other threads being blocked later ** The basic __scheduler in** Windows**__ is known as a **pre-emptive** scheduler and it assigns slices of time known as //**quantums**// to each task to be executed ** the **downside** is that **execution can be interrupted at any point** as Windows balances execution requests from multiple processes ** All versions of **SQL Server** up to and including version 6.5 used the Windows scheduler to take advantage of the work that the Windows team had done through a long history of optimizing processor usage. ** For SQL Server **7.0**, Microsoft decided that SQL Server should **handle its own scheduling**, and created the **__User Mode Scheduler__ (UMS)** to do just that. *** The **UMS** was designed as a **//__co-operative__ scheduling model//** whereby threads __aren’t forcibly interrupted during execution__ but instead __**voluntarily yield the processor when they need to wait for another resource**.__ *** When a thread yields the processor, a **wait type** is assigned to the task to help describe the wait and aid you in troubleshooting performance issues. == SQLOS == Prior to SQLOS (which was first implemented in SQL Server 2005), **__low-level operations__** such as **__scheduling__**, **__I/O completion__**, **__memory management__**, and **__resource management__** were all handled by different teams, which resulted in a lot of duplication of effort as the product evolved. The idea for SQLOS was to consolidate all these efforts of the different internal __SQL Server development teams__ **t__o provide performance improvements__**__ on Windows__, putting them in a single place with a single team that can continue to optimize these low-level functions. This enables the other teams to concentrate on challenges more specific to their own domain within SQL Server. Another benefit to having __everything in one place__ is that you now get better visibility of what’s happening at that level than was possible prior to SQLOS. You can access all this information through __dynamic management views__ (**DMVs**). Any DMV that starts with //**sys.dm_os_**// provides an insight into the workings of SQLOS Many of the components make calls to the SQLOS in order __to fulfill low-level functions__ required to support their roles. The SQLOS **doesn’t replace Windows**. Ultimately, everything ends up using the documented Windows system services; SQL Server just uses them in a way **optimized for its own specific scenarios**. ➤ **sys.dm_os_schedulers** — Returns __one row per scheduler__ (remember, there is one user scheduler per **logical processor)** and displays information about scheduler load and health. ➤ **sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks** — Returns one row for every executing __**task** that is currently waiting__ for a resource, as well as the wait type ➤ **sys.dm_os_memory_clerks** — Memory clerks are used by SQL Server **__to allocate memory__**. Significant **components** within **SQL Server** have their **own memory clerk**. This DMV shows all the memory clerks and how much memory each one is using. See [[image:LifecycleofQuery_10.jpg||height="416" width="818"]]